A 20 minute chat with my dean flipped my view on trigger warnings
Last month at Central Michigan I was furious when a professor got told to add a content note to a lecture about war photography. I emailed the dean about censorship, figured it was admin overreach. She called me in and showed me 3 student complaints from vets who had panic attacks in that exact class. I still think schools go overboard sometimes, but hearing those specific cases made me realize the policy is less about silencing and more about giving people a heads up. Has anyone else changed their mind after actually talking to an administrator one on one?
Three vets having panic attacks in one class is not nothing. My cousin did two tours in Afghanistan and he walked out of a movie theater during a preview for some war film, just bailed in the middle of the row. He wasn't trying to shut the movie down, he just needed a second to breathe. A one line heads up at the top of a slide costs nobody anything. People hear "trigger warning" and picture kids hiding from ideas, but half the time it's just basic manners for folks who already paid a price. Still think some campuses hand them out like candy, but those three complaints are hard to argue with.